climate change

Opinion: The case for optimism post COP26



Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations, speaks at the Opening Ceremony at COP26. Photo credit: Karwai Tang / UK Government via Flickr.

By Anders Lorenzen

For the first time ever in the 27-year history of UN climate talks, at COP26 fossil fuels were mentioned in the final agreement. This shows that we are getting nearer to consigning the fossil fuel industry to history, even though there’s still a long way to go.

Of those fossil fuels, coal will be the first to go. Many countries around the world have signed agreements to phase it out, led by European countries and the US. Even though the wording of the Glasgow Climate Pact was watered down in the 11th hour from phasing-out to phasing-down coal, the direction of travel is clear – coal is on the way out. 

Only three major countries seem to continue to be embracing the dirty brown energy source; India, China and Australia.

Concerned activists, climate advocates and climate-vulnerable countries acknowledged some progress but said that the agreement goes nowhere near far enough. Depending on what data set you read, based on current pledges we are on course for 2.4 or 1.8 degrees C of warming – still some way off the now universally agreed target of 1.5 degrees. But we have moved the goalposts significantly from the Paris Agreement in 2015 when we were then on course for 3.5 degrees C of warming.

A guide to the direction of travel

It would be a mistake to assume that the full and final solution to the climate crisis should only be found at the UN climate talks. Perhaps more accurately the talks work as guidelines to the direction of travel. When planning for the future, governments, businesses, and even individuals know it is both planetary and economic suicide not to ease reliance on fossil fuels and other heavy carbon products.

While it makes for dramatic headlines to focus on, big polluters and large companies which are still heavily invested in fossil fuels. As well as arguing that capitalism can have no future or role in addressing the climate crisis.

But this is plain and simple the wrong conclusion.

It is because it is ignoring thousands of companies around the world who in the last five years alone have made huge advances in cleantech and energy economies.

How far we have come since Paris

When the Paris Agreement was celebrated in 2015, no one was talking about hydrogen as a climate solution, the idea of net-zero targets had not been invented yet, and offshore wind power was mainly a European venture.

Since, hydrogen has emerged as a key climate solution, especially when it comes to decarbonizing industries such as shipping, aviation as well as heating while acknowledging there are huge challenges, not least making sure that hydrogen is produced in a zero-carbon way.   

In the past few years, we have seen several hydrogen initiatives emerging like the one in Denmark where large companies in a mixture of industries such as Scandinavian Airlines (SAS), Maersk and Orsted are collaborating.

Making plans for a zero-carbon world

While it is important to be aware of greenwash tactics, countries, businesses and organisations have been busy setting net-zero targets. These might not be perfect, but they’re at least starting to make plans for a non-fossil-fuel industry world. 

While we are racing ahead in putting in place the clean energy and tech economy of the future many analysts argue that this will not be enough, we do need to remove carbon from the atmosphere. While some NGO’s and activists decry these technologies as a scam and unproven technology, it would be wrong to dismiss them.

One company that has gained a lot of traction is the Swiss company Climeworks which has installed a facility in Iceland that will suck CO2 from the atmosphere. While this pilot project only sucks out a fraction of the CO2 needed to make any serious contribution, the scaling up of this technology and rapid commercialisation will be fascinating to follow in the coming years.

When we discuss climate change, we talk about targets days in the future such as 2030, 2035 & 2050 for instance, but we view what is possible based on today’s technology capacities. But in this space particularly, innovation and advancements are moving faster than most sectors. While we shouldn’t become complacent and should not solely rely on technology to fix the climate crisis, looking at the last decade’s achievements and innovation in the clean energy and tech space, ought to fill us with hope rather than despair. 

6 replies »

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s